Prototyping with CNC machining is a crucial step in product development—but understanding its cost structure can be challenging. Many engineers and startups struggle to estimate expenses accurately, leading to budget overruns or compromises in part quality.
The cost of CNC prototyping depends on material, size, tolerances, volume, and surface finish. For example, a single aluminum prototype may be affordable, while tight-tolerance titanium parts could cost 3x more. The real expense isn’t just machining—it’s the risk of wasted time and money from failed prototypes.
So, how do professionals price CNC prototyping? Below, we break down the five decisive factors that shape your quote—and why focusing only on per-part cost could be a costly mistake.
The raw material often accounts for 20-50% of CNC prototyping costs. Common options like 6061 aluminum are cost-effective, while titanium or PEEK drive prices up dramatically due to higher material costs and machining difficulty.
Some designers assume stainless steel is a "default" choice, but its hardness increases tool wear, raising labor expenses. Meanwhile, plastics like Delrin® (POM) offer a sweet spot for functional testing at lower prices.
A little-known fact: Certain materials (e.g., magnesium) may require special handling or permits, adding hidden logistical costs. Always discuss flammability, toxicity, or export restrictions with your supplier.
For startups, a smart approach is to prototype first in cheaper materials, then switch to the final alloy once the design stabilizes. This avoids wasting expensive stock on iterative tweaks.
Larger CNC prototyping parts demand more raw material—but the real cost multiplier is machine time. A motorcycle engine block may require 10+ hours of machining versus 30 minutes for a tiny gear.
Oversized prototypes also face logistical hurdles. If your part exceeds standard CNC work envelope (e.g., 500x500mm), you might need specialised equipment or even manual repositioning mid-job.
Smaller parts aren’t always cheaper though. Micro-machining (e.g., <1mm features) may need ultra-precise tools and slower feeds, inflating costs. Always ask: "Is every mm of this design truly necessary for testing?"
A ±0.1mm tolerance is routine for CNC shops, but demanding ±0.02mm can triple costs. Such precision requires slower machining, frequent tool changes, and CMM validation—adding hours of labor.
Ironically, ultra-tight tolerances rarely benefit prototypes. Unless testing fit with mating parts (e.g., bearings), relaxed specs can slash costs without compromising functionality.
Watch out for "tolerance stacking." A single critical dimension at ±0.02mm is manageable, but a whole part at that spec turns into a financial black hole. Use GD&T callouts to specify only what matters.
1-off prototypes pay premium rates because CNC setups (fixturing, programming, trial cuts) are amortized over a single part. Ordering 10+ units spreads these fixed costs, often halving per-part prices.
However, "quantity discounts" have limits. For true mass production (1,000+ pieces), OEM injection molding becomes cheaper. CNC’s sweet spot is typically 1–100 units for pre-production validation.
Some shops offer "family mold" pricing—machining multiple design variants in one setup. This is perfect for testing slight iterations (e.g., different screw hole patterns) without re-paying setup fees.
An as-machined finish is free, but bead blasting (+15)oranodizing(+15) or anodizing (+15)oranodizing(+50) adds cost. These aren’t just aesthetic—some finishes improve wear resistance or EMI shielding.
For visual prototypes, painting or polish might seem essential… but consider skipping them. A raw machined part can validate fit/function for 1/3 the price, leaving budget for extra design iterations.
Electroplating (e.g., nickel) is notoriously pricey due to chemical processing. If corrosion testing is needed, ask about cheaper alternatives like salt spray testing unfinished parts.
You May Like:
Vacuum Casting vs Vacuum Forming
Vacuum Casting vs Injection Molding
How Does Injection Moulding Work
Machining Acrylic vs Polycarbonate